Sciatica Pro FAQ: Every Question People Actually Ask

A dietary supplement sold as capsules, 60 capsules to a bottle, two a day. The Supplement Facts panel lists ten ingredients and prints an amount for every one of them — there is no proprietary blend. It is not a medicine, and the label does not say it treats anything.

Capsules. The other-ingredients line names hypromellose (vegetable capsule), so the shell is a vegetable capsule rather than gelatin.

Sixty. The panel prints 30 servings per container and a serving size of 2 capsules, so 60 capsules is exactly 30 servings and the three figures agree.

Thirty days at two capsules a day. That is the cleanest number on the whole product: the count, the serving size and the servings per container all agree with each other.

Because the bottle prints a plus and the supplied pack does not. The label reads Sciatica PRO +; the pack calls it Sciatica Pro. This site reports both rather than choosing one, and it matters only if you are searching for the exact string on the bottle in your hand.

No manufacturer is named anywhere. The bottle prints a distributor: “Distributed By : Sciatica Pro+, Akron, OH 44301, (844) 469-3744, [email protected]”. A roundel on the label says GMPc FACILITY without naming the facility.

Because two appear and nothing supplied explains the relationship. The bottle names Sciatica Pro+, Akron, OH 44301. The pack gives a New York office at 419 Park Avenue South, a New York returns address on Avenue of the Americas, and a different phone and email. This site does not say one is wrong. It says there are two.

A roundel on the label reads MADE IN USA WITH GLOBAL INGREDIENTS. The second half is the useful half: the ingredients are global, and no country is named for any individual one.

The capsule shell is printed as hypromellose (vegetable capsule), which is where a capsule product’s vegetarian claim is won or lost, and the other two other-ingredients are brown rice flour and magnesium stearate. A vegetarian roundel was supplied as a marketing image and names no certifying body, so treat this as a reading of the ingredients line.

The label prints a no-added line — “EGGS, DAIRY, WHEAT, PRESERVATIVES.” — and gluten-free and dairy-free roundels were supplied as marketing images. None of them names a certifying body or a testing threshold, and the line says nothing about the facility. If an allergy is serious, ask the order desk in writing.

Neither. The panel declares four vitamins, three compounds and three plant powders, and the other-ingredients line is hypromellose, brown rice flour and magnesium stearate. There is no sweetener, no stimulant and no sugar.

No. There is no analgesic of any kind in the formula — no acetaminophen, no ibuprofen, no aspirin, no numbing agent — and the bottle makes no pain claim. The two claims on the front are “Clinically Studied Ingredients†” and “Supports Nerve Health†”.

It is a real product with an unusually good Supplement Facts panel: ten ingredients, ten printed amounts, no proprietary blend, and four percentages that are all arithmetically correct. What this desk would not stand behind is the marketing around it — ten reviews with nothing tying any of them to an order, a doctor-formulated roundel that names no doctor, and no price or guarantee supplied at all.

This site does not use that word about it. The label is careful and complete. The problems are evidence and disclosure: no trial cited anywhere studied sciatica, three ingredient amounts are below the amounts their trials used, and two different companies appear on one product. Read the panel and decide for yourself.

No, and no dietary supplement is. FDA does not approve dietary supplements before they are marketed. The disclaimer printed on this bottle says the same thing in its own words: “THESE STATEMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN EVALUATED BY THE FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION.”

That a facility has filed with FDA to say it exists and what it does. It is a filing, not an approval of this product, this formula or either claim on the front, and the seal does not name the facility it refers to.

This desk did not run a database search and does not publish one. No search, date or result was supplied, and a sentence of that kind is worth nothing unless the search was actually done. FDA’s own pages are linked in the sources if you want to run it yourself.

No certificate of analysis document was supplied. A lot code (SP-26/MY-6297), a certificate reference (SP-6297-26-MY) and a label revision (REV 0424) all arrived with the pack. Those are reference strings. Ask the order desk for the document itself, for your lot, in writing.

On this product it means nothing checkable. The roundel names no doctor, no specialty, no institution and no date, and nothing in the supplied material names one either. A physician’s name did arrive with the pack, as this site’s supposed medical reviewer, and it is not published here for the reason given at the foot of every page.

It is the one front-of-bottle claim you can audit, so here is the audit. Three of the ten ingredients carry named clinical trials: alpha lipoic acid, benfotiamine and acetyl L-carnitine. Every one of those trials was in diabetic neuropathy, and every one used more than this label prints. The claim says studied. It does not say studied in sciatica.

Mysciaticapro describes itself as a USA stocking retailer. No register or authorisation number was supplied to sit behind that phrase. The order button here goes to the sales page at sciaticahealthtips.com, which is where the price, the pack and the guarantee wording are binding.

Because they belong to two different organisations. (844) 469-3744 is printed on the bottle beside the Akron distributor. +1 (302) 200-3480 is the order desk named in the pack and the one that can see an order. The website email cannot see an order at all.

No marketplace or retail listing was supplied to this desk. Buying anywhere other than the seller’s own sales page usually means the seller’s guarantee does not reach you, because a guarantee is a promise from a seller rather than a property of the product.

Nobody, yet, and the byline is printed empty on every page — the only marked blank on this site. A physician’s name came with the marketing pack, described as having reviewed pages, posts, the bottle and the ingredients. These pages did not exist when that pack was written, so that cannot be true of them, and her name is not published anywhere here.

Yes. A link from this site to the sales page may earn a commission. That is exactly why the editorial rules on this site are written down, dated and published rather than left to be assumed.

Ten, each with its own printed amount: vitamin D3 20 mcg, vitamin B6 1.7 mg, folate 383 mcg DFE (230 mcg folic acid), vitamin B12 2 mcg, alpha lipoic acid 400 mg, benfotiamine 150 mg, acetyl L-carnitine 50 mg, and ashwagandha, broccoli and turmeric powders at 25 mg each.

All ten amounts are printed on the panel and all ten are listed in the answer above. There is no proprietary blend, so nothing has to be derived, bounded or guessed at. That is the single most unusual thing about this label.

No. Every one of the ten rows carries its own figure and nothing is pooled into a total. Say that plainly, because it is rare: a blend prints one number for a group and leaves a reader unable to state any individual amount at all.

400 mg, printed. For scale: the SYDNEY 2 trial gave 600 mg, 1,200 mg and 1,800 mg once daily for five weeks to 181 patients with diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy, and concluded “An oral dose of 600 mg once daily appears to provide the optimum risk-to-benefit ratio.” So 400 mg is two-thirds of that, in diabetic polyneuropathy rather than in sciatica.

150 mg, printed. A placebo-controlled trial used 300 mg a day and 600 mg a day for six weeks in 165 randomised patients with symmetrical distal diabetic polyneuropathy, concluding “Benfotiamine may extend the treatment option for patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.” 150 mg is half the lower of those two arms.

50 mg, printed. A Cochrane review covered four trials and about 906 participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy at 1,500 mg, 2,000 mg and 3,000 mg a day, and concluded “We are uncertain whether ALC reduces pain in DPN, as the evidence is sparse and of very low certainty.” 50 mg is one thirtieth of the lowest of those doses.

Yes, on all four vitamin rows, and this desk checked each one. Vitamin D3: 20 of a 20 mcg Daily Value is 100%. Vitamin B6: 1.7 of 1.7 mg is 100%. Folate: 383 of 400 mcg DFE is 95.8%, printed as 96%. Vitamin B12: 2 of 2.4 mcg is 83.3%, printed as 83%.

It is a unit conversion, and the label got it right. NIH’s Office of Dietary Supplements states that “240 mcg of folic acid and 400 mcg of folate are both equal to 400 mcg DFE”, a factor of 1.667. So 230 mcg × (400 ÷ 240) = 383.3, rounded to 383 mcg DFE, and 383 of 400 is the 96% printed beside it.

1.7 mg, which is exactly 100% of the Daily Value. This is the most reassuring number on the panel. ODS: “taking high amounts of vitamin B6 from supplements for a year or longer can cause severe nerve damage”. The federal upper limit is 100 mg and ODS notes EFSA “set an upper limit for vitamin B6 of 12 mg per day for all adults”. At 1.7 mg this label is well under either.

The label does not say, and this site will not invent a mechanism. What ODS does say is the thing worth knowing if you take it: large amounts of folate “might hide a vitamin B12 deficiency because these supplements can correct the anemia that the vitamin B12 deficiency causes but not the nerve damage”. 383 mcg DFE is not a large amount — the upper limit is 1,000 mcg — but the mechanism is a nerve mechanism, so it belongs on the page.

ODS gives the honest reason in one sentence: “Vitamin B12 deficiency can damage the nervous system even in people who don’t have megaloblastic anemia.” That is a statement about deficiency. ODS is equally clear that “vitamin B12 doesn’t provide these benefits in people who get enough B12 from their diet.” Whether you are short of it is a blood test, not a purchase.

25 mg each, printed, and all three are declared as powder rather than as standardised extracts with no ratio given. No federal consumer page supplied to this desk gives an amount for any of the three for nerve pain, so this site reports them as present and small and assigns them no effect.

Verbatim from the label: “Hypromellose (vegetable capsule), Brown Rice Flour, Magnesium Stearate.” The first is the capsule shell, the second is the filler, the third is the flow agent that keeps the fill weight consistent.

About 677 mg, and because every amount is printed it is an addition rather than an estimate: 400 + 150 + 50 + 25 + 25 + 25 is 675 mg, plus 1.7 mg of B6, plus 20 + 230 + 2 micrograms, which is another 0.252 mg. The folate is counted as the 230 mcg of folic acid actually in the capsule rather than as the 383 mcg DFE equivalence.

No trial of this formula has been published, so nobody can answer that from evidence — not this desk and not the seller. What exists is three ingredients with named trials, all of them in diabetic neuropathy, all of them at larger amounts than this label prints. No trial cited anywhere on this site studied sciatica.

None that a reader can check. The front of the bottle claims “Clinically Studied Ingredients†”, which is true of three rows out of ten — in diabetic neuropathy, at higher doses. An ingredient trial at a different amount in a different condition is not proof about this product.

Nothing on the bottle says, and no trial of this formula exists to say. The supplied review block does state a typical wait, but that is the seller’s figure rather than a measured one, nothing ties it to an order, and it is not published here as a finding or as a figure.

This bottle does not claim to, and the disclaimer printed on it says so in the regulator’s own words: “THIS PRODUCT IS NOT INTENDED TO DIAGNOSE, TREAT, CURE OR PREVENT ANY DISEASE.” No trial cited anywhere on this site was carried out in sciatica, so nothing published supports a claim of that kind either. MedlinePlus, separately, notes that “Sometimes sciatica goes away on its own.”

Because they were in a different condition and this site says so plainly rather than softening it. All three were in diabetic neuropathy, which is metabolic nerve damage. MedlinePlus: “Sciatica occurs when there is pressure on or damage to the sciatic nerve.” Compression is a different mechanism. That does not make the ingredients useless here — it makes them untested here.

No, although they sit in the same federal sentence. NINDS: “Examples of conditions that cause neuropathic pain are diabetic neuropathy, shingles, and sciatica.” Both are neuropathic pain. One is metabolic nerve damage and the other is pressure on a nerve, and a trial in one is not a trial in the other.

It is two-thirds of the 600 mg that the SYDNEY 2 trial called optimal, in patients with diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Two-thirds of a studied dose is a real fraction rather than a token, and the condition is still not the one on the front of the bottle.

It is one thirtieth of 1,500 mg, the lowest daily dose in the trials a Cochrane review examined in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. And even at thirty times this amount, in the condition that was actually studied, that review concluded “We are uncertain whether ALC reduces pain in DPN, as the evidence is sparse and of very low certainty.”

It is half the 300 mg lower arm of a placebo-controlled trial in symmetrical distal diabetic polyneuropathy. The authors’ own wording was cautious even at the studied doses: “Benfotiamine may extend the treatment option for patients with diabetic polyneuropathy.”

This site does not say that it does, because nothing published supports it. What the bottle says is “Supports Nerve Health†”, a structure/function claim carrying the FDA disclaimer. FDA does not review such a claim before it is used.

Nothing federal says so. ODS explains why B12 belongs in a nerve conversation at all — “Vitamin B12 deficiency can damage the nervous system even in people who don’t have megaloblastic anemia” — which is a statement about deficiency. On vitamin D and a nerve disease, ODS says that in multiple sclerosis “taking vitamin D supplements does not keep symptoms from getting worse or coming back.”

A randomised placebo-controlled trial of this formula, at these amounts, in people with sciatica, published somewhere a reader can check. Not an ingredient trial at a larger dose in a different condition, and not a review wall.

No guarantee length or conditions were supplied to this desk. The pack says only “Guarantee: As printed on the live checkout”, which is where the length and the conditions are printed. Read the real wording at the checkout before you pay, and screenshot it with the date showing. A money-back roundel was supplied as an image; an image is not a term.

Two capsules a day, with water. The label says “As a dietary supplement, adults take two (2) capsules daily. For best results, take with 6-8 oz of water or as directed by a healthcare professional.”

The label names no time of day, and nothing in the supplied material names one either. So there is no morning-or-evening instruction to follow or to get wrong. Pick a time you will actually keep to, and take it with the six to eight ounces of water the label asks for.

Not stated anywhere on the label. It asks for 6-8 oz of water and nothing else. Many people take capsules with a meal simply because it is an easier habit to keep.

The label says two capsules daily and does not divide them. It also says “Do not exceed recommended dose.” If splitting them across the day suits you better, that is a question for a pharmacist rather than for this site, because the label does not address it.

No. The label says two and adds “Do not exceed recommended dose.” Doubling it doubles everything, including the vitamin B6 — the one ingredient here where ODS warns that “taking high amounts of vitamin B6 from supplements for a year or longer can cause severe nerve damage”.

Nothing on the label addresses it. Take the next serving at the usual time rather than taking four capsules to catch up, because the label’s one instruction about quantity is not to exceed the dose.

The label does not say. The one duration-related sentence in the federal record that bears on this panel is about vitamin B6 at high amounts over “a year or longer”, and at 1.7 mg this product is nowhere near the amounts that sentence is about.

The label does not say, and there is no published schedule for this formula. For scale, the two ingredient trials that printed a length ran five weeks and six weeks — in diabetic neuropathy, at larger amounts. MedlinePlus says to contact a provider if “This episode of back pain has lasted longer than 4 weeks”, which is a better clock to watch than a bottle.

The label is specific: “KEEP OUT OF THE REACH OF CHILDREN. DO NOT USE IF SAFETY SEAL IS DAMAGED OR MISSING. STORE IN A COOL, DRY PLACE.”

Do not use it. The label says so directly. Call the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480 with your order ID, and keep the bottle rather than throwing it away.

Take the panel to a pharmacist rather than a search engine, and take it with you rather than describing it. The specific thing to add up across products is vitamin B6, because B-complexes, multivitamins and energy products often contain it and it is the one ingredient here where an excess causes nerve damage.

No. The label asks for a cool, dry place, which means a cupboard rather than a bathroom shelf or a car glovebox.

None are published for this product, because no safety study of this formula exists. What is published belongs to individual ingredients. The one that matters most here is vitamin B6, and this label is restrained about it at 1.7 mg.

No safety testing of this product has been published and FDA does not test supplements before sale. What can be said: all ten amounts are printed, the four vitamin rows sit at or below their Daily Values and well below their upper limits, and the label carries a real caution paragraph. Six of the ten rows have no federal consumer fact sheet at all, which means no published safety information either way.

Yes, and it is the most important safety sentence on this page. ODS: “taking high amounts of vitamin B6 from supplements for a year or longer can cause severe nerve damage”. The federal upper limit is 100 mg a day and ODS notes EFSA “set an upper limit for vitamin B6 of 12 mg per day for all adults”. This label prints 1.7 mg, which is why it gets credit here rather than a warning.

At large amounts, that is the published concern. ODS: large amounts of folate “might hide a vitamin B12 deficiency because these supplements can correct the anemia that the vitamin B12 deficiency causes but not the nerve damage”, and “Large doses of folate supplements might also worsen the symptoms of vitamin B12 deficiency.” 383 mcg DFE is not a large dose — the upper limit is 1,000 mcg — but mention it to a clinician if a B12 deficiency is possible.

No. 20 mcg is 100% of the Daily Value, it is the RDA ODS gives for adults 71 and over (“20 mcg (800 IU)”), and the upper limit is “100 mcg (4,000 IU)”. It is worth adding up across products if you already take a separate vitamin D.

ODS is unusually direct: “Vitamin B12 has not been shown to cause any harm, even at high doses.” This label prints 2 mcg against an adult RDA of “2.4 mcg”.

No interaction study of this product exists, and no federal consumer fact sheet was supplied for alpha lipoic acid, benfotiamine, acetyl L-carnitine or the three plant powders, so no federal interaction is published here for six of the ten rows. Hand the panel to a pharmacist, especially if you take anything for blood sugar, blood pressure or blood thinning.

That is a question for your prescriber, and it is worth asking rather than guessing: three of the ingredients on this panel were studied in people with diabetic neuropathy, which means they were studied in people taking diabetes medicines. Nothing supplied to this desk gives a federal interaction statement, so the honest answer is ask, with the bottle in your hand.

Ask a pharmacist first and take the panel with you. The label’s own caution covers it: anyone “with a known medical condition should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement.” No federal interaction statement was supplied for any of the six non-vitamin rows.

The label answers this directly and this site will not improve on it: “Pregnant or nursing mothers, children under the age of 18, and individuals with a known medical condition should consult a physician before using this or any dietary supplement.”

Anyone under 18. Anyone pregnant or nursing, or with a known medical condition, until a physician has said otherwise — that is the label’s own caution. And anyone whose symptoms are on the red-flag list, because that is a call to a provider rather than a purchase.

MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia prints the instruction as “Contact your provider right away if you have:” and the list includes “Loss of control of urine or stool (incontinence)”, fever with back pain, and weakness or numbness in the leg or pelvis. If any of those describes you, make the call today.

Age is not what the label’s caution turns on — medication and existing conditions are, and both are more common with age. Two rows are worth noting: the 20 mcg of vitamin D3 matches the RDA ODS gives for adults 71 and over, and the 1.7 mg of B6 matches the RDA for men 51 and over.

MedlinePlus: “Sciatica is a symptom of a problem with the sciatic nerve, the largest nerve in the body.” Note the word symptom. The Medical Encyclopedia adds the mechanism: “Sciatica occurs when there is pressure on or damage to the sciatic nerve.”

MedlinePlus: “When you have sciatica, you have pain, weakness, numbness, or tingling.” The Medical Encyclopedia adds that it “Sciatica pain can vary widely. It may feel like a mild tingling, dull ache, or burning sensation.”

MedlinePlus: “It can start in the lower back and extend down your leg to your calf, foot, or even your toes.”

Yes. MedlinePlus: “It’s usually on only one side of your body.” The Medical Encyclopedia puts it the same way: “The pain most often occurs on one side of the body.”

MedlinePlus names three: “A ruptured intervertebral disk”; “Narrowing of the spinal canal that puts pressure on the nerve, called spinal stenosis”; and “An injury such as a pelvic fracture.” All three are mechanical. And then the sentence that should govern expectations: “In many cases no cause can be found.”

MedlinePlus, in five words: “Sometimes sciatica goes away on its own.” That is the whole of what the federal page says about it, and it is worth knowing before you spend anything: sometimes is neither a promise nor a reason to wait out a red-flag symptom.

No duration is given on the federal pages supplied to this desk, and this site will not invent one. What is given is a threshold for action: the MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia says to contact a provider if “This episode of back pain has lasted longer than 4 weeks”. Four weeks is the number to watch.

No federal page supplied to this desk names a fastest way, and nothing on this site offers one. What MedlinePlus says is this: “Treatment, if needed, depends on the cause of the problem. It may include exercises, medicines, and surgery.” Since treatment depends on the cause, and since “In many cases no cause can be found”, the first step is finding out which case you are in — which is a clinician, not a capsule.

MedlinePlus: “Treatment, if needed, depends on the cause of the problem. It may include exercises, medicines, and surgery.” Three things, and the choice among them follows the cause.

The federal pages supplied to this desk give no list of things to avoid, so this site does not publish one. What they do give is a list of symptoms that mean contact a provider right away, and the four-week threshold above. If you want an avoid-list for your own case, it has to come from somebody who knows what is causing yours.

The MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia prints it as “Contact your provider right away if you have:” and the list includes “Loss of control of urine or stool (incontinence)”, fever with back pain, and weakness or numbness in the leg or pelvis. The same page also says to contact a provider if the episode has lasted longer than four weeks, for unintentional weight loss, or for pain worse than previous episodes.

MedlinePlus calls it a symptom: “Sciatica is a symptom of a problem with the sciatic nerve, the largest nerve in the body.” That distinction is doing real work, because a symptom points at something underneath it that may or may not have been found yet.

NINDS lists it as such: “Examples of conditions that cause neuropathic pain are diabetic neuropathy, shingles, and sciatica.” All three are neuropathic pain, and all three are different conditions — which is exactly why a trial in one of them is not a trial in another.

NINDS: “Research has shown that some complementary health approaches can improve pain in some people. These include acupuncture, chiropractic care, massage therapy, tai chi, and others.” Dietary supplements are not named in that sentence. That is not a finding against them; it is what the page says and does not say.

No price was supplied to this desk, so none is printed on this site. The pack is explicit: “Print live checkout prices. Do not guess.” So the figure for one, three or six bottles is read at the checkout, which is the only page that can be charging you what it says. Read it before you pay and screenshot it with the date showing.

Three. Pack images were supplied for one bottle, three bottles and six bottles, so three sizes are offered. What each one costs is printed on the checkout page. A bottle is thirty days, so the three packs are thirty, ninety and a hundred and eighty days of supply.

Do this at the checkout, in one step: divide each pack figure by its day count — 30, 90 and 180 days respectively — and compare the three per-day numbers. The day counts are certain because a bottle is sixty capsules at two a day. The figures are on the checkout page, so the comparison is a live one rather than one copied from somewhere older.

A bottle is sixty capsules at two a day, which is thirty days, so the arithmetic is one step at the checkout: take the per-bottle figure printed there and divide it by 30. That is the number to compare across the three pack sizes, and it is the only comparison that holds.

No shipping cost was supplied, so there is no figure here and no free-shipping claim either. What was supplied: orders ship “From the US unless the sales page says otherwise”, with a tracking number in the order email. The shipping line is printed at the checkout; read it there, because it is part of what you pay.

None was supplied to this desk and none is printed here. If you meet one at the checkout it is the seller’s figure, not one this desk has checked. The question worth asking about any struck-through number is whether the product was actually sold at it.

From the sales page at sciaticahealthtips.com, which the order button on this site links to. That page is where the price, the pack and the guarantee wording are set and binding. This site is a retailer page and cannot see an order.

None was supplied. If you are offered one, read what happens on the day it ends before you enter a card number, and screenshot that page with the date showing.

The length and the conditions are printed at the checkout, because the pack supplied only a pointer — “Guarantee: As printed on the live checkout”. The mechanics were supplied: call +1 (302) 200-3480 with the order ID, return postage is the buyer’s cost, use a tracked service, and put your full name, email address and order ID in with the parcel.

3 to 5 business days after they credit it, then a further 5 to 10 days on the card. The first window is the seller’s and the second belongs to the card network, which is why the total can feel longer than either.

Your order ID, the email address the confirmation went to, a screenshot of the guarantee wording with the date showing, and a tracking number for the return. The parcel must carry your full name, email address and order ID. Returns go to 1166 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 7, New York, NY 10036.

You do. Return shipping is the buyer’s cost and a tracked service is advised, because without tracking you have no evidence the parcel arrived. That much was supplied. The window the parcel has to arrive inside is printed at the checkout, so read it there and screenshot it.

Nothing in the material supplied to this desk mentions a subscription, a trial, or recurring billing of any kind. That is not the same as a guarantee, because this desk has not seen the live checkout. Read the page you are actually paying on, and look for trial, auto-ship, subscribe, recurring, monthly or a pre-ticked box before you enter a card number.

Six things, and they take a minute. The total, including shipping. Any pre-ticked box. The words trial, auto-ship, subscribe, recurring or monthly anywhere on the page. The guarantee wording, its length and when it starts. The name that will appear on your statement — no payment processor is named anywhere in the supplied material, so you cannot know it in advance. And which company you are buying from, because two appear on this product. Screenshot the page with the date showing.

On the supplied material: an order confirmation email with the purchase date and the order ID, then a parcel shipped from inside the United States with a tracking number in that email. No carrier, dispatch time or delivery estimate was supplied. Keep the confirmation email — it is the document a refund claim runs on.

If you find you have been enrolled in one, the order desk is the first call: +1 (302) 200-3480 or [email protected], with your order ID in front of you. Ask for the cancellation in writing and keep the reply. If the desk cannot be reached or will not cancel, your card issuer can block further charges from that merchant — that is a request you make to your bank, not to the seller.

Call the number on the back of your card, or use your bank or card app, and say you want to dispute a transaction. Have the date, the amount, the merchant name as it appears on your statement, and what you did to resolve it with the seller. Ask them to block further transactions from that merchant at the same time. Card networks set time limits on disputes, so do it rather than wait.

Nobody told this desk. No payment processor is named anywhere in the supplied material, and the two companies printed on this product have different names and different states. Read the merchant name on the checkout page before you pay and screenshot it, because that string is what you will need if you ever have to dispute the charge.

This site cannot resolve that for you and does not pretend to. The bottle prints Sciatica Pro+, Akron, OH 44301. The pack gives a New York office, a New York returns address, and a different phone and email. Ask the order desk, in writing, which entity will appear on the receipt.

Two places, and they do different jobs. The Federal Trade Commission takes fraud, advertising and billing complaints at reportfraud.ftc.gov. The FDA takes reports about the product itself — a reaction, a bottle that does not match its label, a supplement sold as a treatment for a disease — through MedWatch or the consumer complaint system.

In order: call the order desk and ask to cancel and refund, and get it in writing; read the guarantee terms you accepted and screenshot them; if a window applies, return the parcel tracked, with your full name, email and order ID inside; if the desk does not answer, raise a dispute with your card issuer; and if a reaction is involved, speak to a clinician before anything else.

A clinician first, if you are unwell. Then FDA, through MedWatch or the consumer complaint system, because that is the route that puts the report where it can be counted. Keep the bottle, the lot code on it and the order email: all three are part of the report.

You can tell this desk about a mistake on a page — [email protected], Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET — and it will be corrected and dated. This desk cannot see, change, cancel or refund an order. That is the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480.