Editorial Standards: The Six Rules Every Page Here Follows

Rule three does most of the work, so it is worth making precise. Every quotation on this site comes from a named published source and is stored as an exact string. The domains are listed rather than described: medlineplus.gov, ods.od.nih.gov, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, reportfraud.ftc.gov, www.cochrane.org, www.ecfr.gov, www.fda.gov and www.ninds.nih.gov. 15 sources across those domains are cited on this site, each one listed with its publisher, its title, its domain and the date it was read — October 11, 2026 — in the references at the foot of the page that cites it. No blog, no aggregator, no seller’s press release, no journal paper read second-hand. If a claim cannot be supported from one of those sources or from the photographed bottle, it does not appear.

That rule has consequences this site accepts rather than works around. Six of the ten ingredients on this panel have no federal consumer fact sheet in the supplied material: alpha lipoic acid, benfotiamine, acetyl L-carnitine, ashwagandha, broccoli and turmeric. For three of those six, a named trial exists and is used. For the other three, each printed at 25 mg, there is no federal amount for nerve pain to compare the printed figure against, so this site reports that they are present, that the amount is small, and nothing more. A site willing to cite anything could fill those three gaps with paragraphs. This one prints that the gap exists and leaves it empty on purpose.

Quotations are handled one way only. Each is copied from the source it came from, stored as a string, and printed inside quotation marks unchanged. Nothing is paraphrased into quotation marks, nothing is reassembled from fragments, and nothing is trimmed in a way that changes its force. Where a source’s wording is narrower than the shorthand people use, the narrow wording is kept: MedlinePlus is quoted as “Sciatica is a symptom of a problem with the sciatic nerve, the largest nerve in the body.”, with the word symptom intact, rather than being tidied into a sentence about a disease. Short quotations are preferred, because a short exact quote is safer than a long one stitched together.

No figure that costs money, in any wording

The other half of rule six, in practice. No price, pack total, shipping cost, discount, saving, percentage off, guarantee length or start point appears anywhere on this site, because none of them was supplied. The instruction came from the seller’s own material and it is the right one: “Print live checkout prices. Do not guess.”. This site follows it literally. So everywhere a money figure would belong — the one-bottle, three-bottle and six-bottle figures, the shipping line, the length of the guarantee and the conditions on it — the sentence says the figure is shown at the checkout and tells you to read it there before you pay. The guarantee arrived as a pointer and nothing else: “Guarantee: As printed on the live checkout”. That is a finished answer rather than a gap: the figure that binds a buyer is the one on the page that charges them, and no page here can be right about it a month later. The price page sets out which lines to read on that checkout, and in what order.

The regulation, the name, and the full stop after it

The other place this site stops deliberately. 21 CFR 101.93 defines a disease as “damage to an organ, part, structure, or system of the body such that it does not function properly.”. The same section, at paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(A), lists one of the ways a claim about a disease may be made: “The name of the product;”. The product is called Sciatica Pro. Those two things are set beside each other and this site stops there. It does not write that the product is illegal, mislabelled or in violation, and it does not predict an enforcement action. FDA has made no finding about this product and neither has this desk; no warning letter, determination or action was supplied and none is implied. What can be said in addition is the shape of it, and it is to the label’s credit: the front of the bottle carries only the structure/function claims “Clinically Studied Ingredients†” and “Supports Nerve Health†”, both daggered, with the disclaimer printed on the back — which is the careful way to do it. The reader draws the conclusion.

Corrections, and the address that cannot see your order

A correction is made at the top of the page it affects, with the date it was made, and it stays there; it is not folded silently into the prose and it is not moved to a corrections page nobody visits. The address is [email protected], open Mon–Fri 9:00am–5:00pm ET. What helps a correction land is the page, the line, and what you believe the right figure or wording to be: a message naming a sentence is actionable in minutes, a message saying a page is wrong is not. That address is an editorial address and it cannot see an order — not tracking, not a change of address, not a refund. The only desk that can is the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480, and sending a refund request to the editorial address loses days inside a window whose length is printed at the checkout and nowhere else.

What is checkable about this page

Hold any page here against the six rules and the test is mechanical rather than a matter of trust. Where the bottle and the pack disagree, are both printed? Does every amount come off the panel, with the division shown where a percentage or a fraction is claimed, and is the condition the trial ran in named in the same sentence as the dose? Does every quotation sit inside quotation marks with a named publisher and a date in the references? Does every criticism of the label share a page with the credit the label has earned? Do the red flags sit above the product copy on every safety page, and is the product the subject of any sentence about sciatica? Is there a star rating or a money figure anywhere, in text or in structured data, and are the four reviewer blanks still the only marked blanks on the site? Every one of those can be answered from the page source in a couple of minutes, which is the only kind of editorial policy worth publishing.